All eyes on IMM Investment’s governance structure The PE firm is mandated to disclose corporate information to the public under antitrust law
Translated by Ryu Ho-joung 공개 2020-05-11 08:00:17
이 기사는 2020년 05월 11일 08:00 thebell 에 표출된 기사입니다.
Attention is being focused on the possibility of changes to IMM Investment’s governance after the South Korean private equity firm has been included in the list of enterprise groups subject to publication of corporate information – the first such case among private equity firms in the country.The country's antitrust watchdog Fair Trade Commission (FTC) said on May 3 that it designated 64 enterprise groups subject to publication of corporate information and gave notice to them. Among them is IMM Investment, which marks the first time for a private equity firm in the country.
IMM Investment was added to the designation list because it met two conditions prescribed under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act. First, the total assets of companies belonging to the enterprise group exceed 5 trillion won, and the second is that the same natural person substantially controls the enterprise group.
As of the end of 2019, 79 companies belong to IMM Investment and its total assets stood at around 6.3 trillion won, surpassing the 5 trillion won threshold with 12 new investment vehicles added last year. Currently, three senior executives of IMM Investment hold the entire stake in IMM, LLC (IMM) – the corporation at the top of the group’s governance hierarchy – and its chief executive Ji Sung-bae owns 42.76 percent of IMM, which makes it meet the description of the second condition.
To be removed from the designation, IMM Investment would have to maintain its total assets under 5 trillion won, which is an unrealistic option for the private equity firm. Nonetheless, it is still possible to make changes to its governance structure to circumvent the regulation.
To that end, IMM Investment would need to change a legal entity that substantially controls the group from the current natural person to a juristic person. This means IMM’s total shares should be evenly owned by several individuals.
“If several people own a similar fraction of the total shares, then it can be deemed that a natural person does not substantially control the enterprise group,” an FTC official said.
If IMM Investment changes its governance structure this way, IMM, which is a juristic person, would be deemed to be a legal entity that has substantial control over the group. After that, it additionally needs to change IMM’s type of business to include financing or insurance business – the two sectors exempted from the antitrust regulation because companies in these sectors are regulated under the separate Acts.
“Companies included in this watch list are mandated to disclose corporate information including their investment assets, which could be a significant risk to an investment firm,” an industry insider noted. Fine will be imposed on companies that fail to comply with the mandatory rules on publication or make a false disclosure.
“We are not considering at all changing our governance structure,” a representative for IMM Investment said.
(By reporter Kim Byung-yoon)
< 저작권자 ⓒ 자본시장 미디어 'thebell', 무단 전재, 재배포 및 AI학습 이용 금지 >
관련기사
best clicks
최신뉴스 in 전체기사
-
- [아시아나 화물사업부 M&A]MBK 손잡은 에어프레미아, 다크호스 등극
- [대기업 프로스포츠 전술전략]전북현대, '돈방석' 기회 끝내 놓쳤다
- 골프존, 주가 하락에 발목잡혔나…GDR 분할 '무산'
- [Art Price Index]시장가치 못 찾은 퍼포먼스 작품
- 하이브 '집안싸움'이 가리키는 것
- 이익률 업계 톱인데 저평가 여전…소통 강화하는 OCI
- KB금융, 리딩금융의 품격 ‘주주환원’ 새 패러다임 제시
- 대외 첫 메시지 낸 최창원 의장의 속내는
- KG모빌리티, 라인 하나로 전기차까지
- [이사회 분석]갈 길 바쁜 LS이브이코리아, 사외이사 없이 간다